Â鶹´«Ã½

To understand the benefits of today¡¯s flood modeling, it¡¯s best to first understand how it¡¯s been done historically, and how current technology does the job better.

The limits of traditional flood mapping

Traditionally, engineers have carried out flood mapping using methods not much changed from?precomputer times. They¡¯d use field survey techniques to take a series of cross-sections of the drainage basin and interpolate¡ªor guess at¡ªthe points in between.?

It was slow and costly, and as a result only a limited numbers of scenarios could be considered¡ªperhaps a 10-year flood and a 100-year flood¡ªat a time. It focused on ¡°fluvial¡± flooding in which a watercourse burst its banks. And wasn¡¯t viable for modeling ¡°pluvial¡± (or flash) flooding, when intense precipitation covers the ground, unrelated to a watercourse.

These traditional approaches provided binary answers¡ªan area was either ¡°inside¡± or ¡°outside¡± a line on a map indicating a flood zone. In some cases, people with flooded properties outside those lines were left puzzled, frustrated, and angry: ¡°We thought our house was in a safe place!¡± ?

Improved technology for understanding flood risk

Now, better help is available. Flood modelers have?much more powerful tools, like Google¡¯s FloodHub and Â鶹´«Ã½¡¯s Flood Predictor to do their jobs. Tools like these improve flood prediction in at least three ways:

• More complex and realistic computer-based models: We can now model a wider range of factors, including the likelihood of pluvial flooding based on various rainfall forecasts, and the expected depth of the water if a flood were to occur. These more sophisticated approaches can help us determine the relative likelihood of a flood occurring and the possible damage it could cause if it does. For example, used Flood Predictor for several counties to give local officials access to flood risk probability specifically around storm events.
• Faster processing: Today¡¯s computers can handle much larger data models and produce useful results more quickly than ever before. With a data model built, we can forecast possible flood effects based on various storm and rainwater inputs in minutes. It doesn¡¯t have to take days, weeks, or months. This means it¡¯s practical to?try out a myriad of scenarios¡ªsuch as storms of various durations, intensity, and location.
• Better data: There¡¯s now loads of high-resolution, current data available from satellites and aircraft. For instance, in the United States, Â鶹´«Ã½¡¯s Flood Predictor uses data from the US Geological Survey¡¯s Digital Elevation Model and National Land Cover Database. We also use Daymet Climatology and the US National Hydrography Dataset. As a result, flood modelers can now access detailed, high-resolution data on areas that have never been mapped before.? ?

One of the great benefits of these advancements is the ability to provide probabilistic results. Much like your local weather forecast, we can now assign percentage likelihood to various flood scenarios and make more contextual decisions than ever before.

Probabilistic results are really a game changer. They can help property owners understand that if they build or buy in a specific place what their flood risk will be in a variety of possible scenarios. It also helps decide what steps they can take to mitigate those risks. ?

These models can also help municipal governments know what kinds of development should be built in a flood plain. Perhaps a designated area is best suited for sports and recreation facilities but not residences. Or certain kinds of development could be approved, provided mitigation steps such as a raised building footprint, are included.

Limitations of computer models

Just as it¡¯s important to understand what today¡¯s flood modeling systems can do, it¡¯s equally important to understand what they can¡¯t.?

In many models such as Google¡¯s FloodHub, there is still a strong focus on riverine¡ªor fluvial¡ªflooding.?At present, this limits the tool¡¯s use to only one type of flood risk. By contrast, Â鶹´«Ã½¡¯s Flood Predictor?models both riverine flooding and pluvial flooding, offering users a wider view of potential flood risks. ?

Some flood models focus on flood risk at specific locations. For example, FloodHub?uses AI to provide SMS alerts about timing and height of river flooding. People living beside those rivers can receive warning if their community is at risk from rising waters. Â鶹´«Ã½¡¯s Flood Predictor, by contrast, can provide flood risk data for specific locations or for wider geographic areas once a community invests in a flood model.

What¡¯s coming next in flood modeling?

In the future, we expect to see greater ability of flood modeling to reflect reality.

This includes the ability to model velocity of water, as well as the effects of debris¡ªincluding tree branches and logs, and sediment load. There will be the ability to model combined risks from more than one source of flooding. We¡¯ll also be able to model the effects of various mitigation measures such as stormwater improvements and catchment basins.

We¡¯re already seeing benefits from combining detailed data with technologies such as active learning and machine learning (AL/ML). Using those tools, the program can?learn from experience and direction of the operator. This can help predict the probability of flood events in cases where there are gaps in traditional methods or due to changes in climate, including patterns of precipitation. Current technology can use AL/ML to produce more realistic results within minutes.

Going forward, municipal leaders will continue to have greater confidence that their communities won¡¯t be surprised by unexpected flooding. They¡¯ll have less fear of losing community trust by enacting?flood protection measures that turn out to be unneeded. This means better protection of lives, property, and infrastructure from the risk of flooding.